Comparison

Pulsetic vs Narvin, compared honestly

Both start free and price their paid tiers at $9. The difference is what each dollar buys: Narvin gives you more monitors per tier and white-label AI client reports at $19 — Pulsetic gives you SMS and voice calls, status-page depth, and a 300-monitor top tier at $49.

Narvin and Pulsetic are both website-monitoring services with free tiers and $9 entry plans. Narvin's edge is capacity and reporting: 25 monitors at $9 versus Pulsetic's 10, and AI-written, white-label client reports at $19/mo — a feature Pulsetic gates behind its $49 Organization plan in plain (non-AI) form via branding options.

Pulsetic's edge is telephony and scale at the top: SMS and voice-call alerts ship today, its status pages are a core focus, and its $49 tier covers 300 monitors at 30-second checks — three times Narvin's monitor ceiling.

Which one fits depends on whether your bottleneck is client reporting and cost per monitor (Narvin) or phone-grade alerting and very large portfolios (Pulsetic).

Feature	Narvin	Pulsetic
Free plan	5 monitors at 5 min checks + 1 sample AI report	10 monitors at 5-min checks
$9/mo plan	25 monitors at 1 min checks	Solo — 10 monitors at 60s checks
Top self-serve plan	$19/mo — 100 monitors at 30s checks	$49/mo Organization — 300 monitors at 30s checks
White-label	$19/mo — white-label AI client reports (your logo, colors and sender name)	$49/mo Organization tier only
AI client reports	10–200/month on paid plans (1 free sample) — white-label PDF with GA4 / Search Console / Plausible data merged in	Not offered
Alert channels	Email, Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, signed webhooks	Email, SMS, voice calls, Slack, Discord, Telegram
False-alarm protection	Checks from 3 regions on 3 continents; majority quorum before an incident opens	Multi-location checks (see vendor docs for confirmation behavior)
Analytics in reports	Google Analytics 4, Search Console and Plausible merged into client reports	Not offered

Pulsetic details last verified against pulsetic.com/pricing in June 2026. Check the vendor's site for current plans before deciding.

Why agencies pick Narvin

Per dollar, Narvin carries more monitors at every shared price point: 25 vs 10 at $9, and 100 monitors at 30-second checks for $19 — a configuration Pulsetic prices inside its $49 tier. The bigger difference is reporting: Narvin turns each client's monitoring plus their GA4, Search Console or Plausible data into an AI-written monthly report, white-labeled from the $19 plan. Every number in the report is traced to a recorded data point, so the AI cannot invent results.

When Pulsetic is the better choice

If your on-call process runs on phone alerts, Pulsetic ships SMS and voice calls today — Narvin doesn't. If you monitor more than 100 sites, Pulsetic's 300-monitor Organization tier is the roomier ceiling. And if branded public status pages are the centerpiece of what you sell to clients, that's Pulsetic's home turf.

The bottom line

Choose Narvin when monitoring is a means to an end — keeping client sites healthy and proving it with a report you can forward unedited. Choose Pulsetic when you need telephony-grade alerting or a very large monitor count under one roof.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper for white-label client reporting?

Narvin. White-label client reports — your logo, brand color and sender name, with the "Powered by Narvin" footer removable — are included in the $19/mo Advanced plan. Pulsetic gates white-labeling behind its $49/mo Organization tier, and its reports don't include an AI-written narrative.

Which gives you more monitors for the money?

It depends on scale. At $9, Narvin includes 25 monitors to Pulsetic's 10. At the top, Narvin's $19 plan covers 100 monitors at 30-second checks, while Pulsetic's $49 plan covers 300 — so portfolios above 100 sites currently fit better on Pulsetic.

Does Narvin have SMS and voice-call alerts like Pulsetic?

No. Narvin alerts through email, Slack, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp and signed webhooks, with per-monitor channel routing and severity thresholds. Pulsetic is the better pick if SMS or voice calls are a requirement today.

What makes Narvin's client reports different?

They're written by AI from your real data and grounded by design: monitors are grouped per client, analytics from GA4, Search Console or Plausible are merged in, and every number the report cites is traced to a recorded data point. The output is a branded PDF with an executive summary, what changed, and 3–5 ranked recommendations.

Fiyatlandırma

Dürüst fiyatlandırma, sürpriz yok.

Beş monitör ve bir örnek AI raporuyla ücretsiz başlayın. 300 siteye, 30 saniyelik kontrollere ve ayda 200 AI müşteri raporuna ölçeklenin — ve yıllık ödeyerek %20 tasarruf edin.